Mock Data (MDS): Difference between revisions
(→pass 0) |
|||
(180 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | = MDC2020 ensembles = | ||
MDC2024 is the original name which is now part of MDC2020, and refers specifically to the ensembles/mock data made using MDC2020 stops and primaries. | |||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
Line 8: | Line 10: | ||
* to help us understand the size of our data .art files and ntuples. | * to help us understand the size of our data .art files and ntuples. | ||
== | == Notes and Developer Details == | ||
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bJS8e5AjnK8CR9j4Bcket7a7vv9A4sAgC2AbTUPl7t4/edit?usp=sharing | |||
== Streams == | |||
The two purposes above (physics studies, trigger studies) will result in different samples, with differing complexity. | |||
=== Physics stream === | |||
Includes all major components and pile-up. The DIOtail momentum cut can be higher (nominally p>95 MeV/c will be used as a starting point). Three samples will be made: signal at just below current limit (1e-13), closed sample (random signal choice), no signal. | |||
=== Trigger stream === | |||
Here all backgrounds and pile-up will be included but no signal. The DIOtail cut is reduced below the trigger threshold to p > 75 MeV/c. | |||
== Inputs == | |||
There are several assumptions made when we choose a livetime: | |||
=== Booster Batch Mode === | |||
The Booster Batch (BB) mode describes the incoming operational mode of the booster which feeds the beam through our delivery ring which in turn passes protons to Mu2e. | |||
There are two "run modes" in Mu2e: 1BB and 2BB, in the low-intensity running mode the mean intensity is 1.6E7 protons/pulse and in the higher-intensity mode this becomes 3.9E7 protons/pulse. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| Batch | |||
!| Time (s) | |||
!| T Cycle (s) | |||
!| T Spill (s) | |||
!| Spills | |||
!| frac | |||
!| On Spill Time | |||
!| N-cycles | |||
!| POT per cycle | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>1 </tt> | |||
|<tt>9.52E+06</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.33</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.07E-01</tt> | |||
|<tt>4</tt> | |||
|<tt>0.323</tt> | |||
|<tt>3.07E+06</tt> | |||
|<tt>7.16E+06</tt> | |||
|<tt>4.00E+12</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>2 </tt> | |||
|<tt>1.58E+06</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.4</tt> | |||
|<tt>4.31E-02</tt> | |||
|<tt>8</tt> | |||
|<tt>0.246</tt> | |||
|<tt>3.89E+05</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.13E+06</tt> | |||
|<tt>8.00E+12</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== Expected DIOs === | |||
The expected number of muon stops per POT is 1.56E-3 muons/POT (from MDC2020p). The decay : capture ratio for Al is 0.39:0.61. | |||
In our simulation, we tend to focus on simulating the higher momentum tail with cuts of p > 75MeV/c sampling a fraction of 4.19E-07 of the entire DIO spectrum. and p > 95 MeV/c sampling a fraction of 3.64E-11 of the entire DIO spectrum. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| livetime | |||
!| BB | |||
!| POT | |||
!| Stopped Muons | |||
!| DIOs (p>75MeV/c) | |||
!| DIOs (p>95MeV/c) | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>1 hour </tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.08E16</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.67e+13</tt> | |||
|<tt>7.10e6</tt> | |||
|<tt>609</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== Sim Efficiencies and Databases == | |||
One major improvement from the previous MDC2018 is that we now have database implementation in Mu2e. This includes a "SimEfficiency" data-base which can be used to extract the expected rates from the simulation, without need for hardcoding. Here is an example of how to extract the number of stopped muons per pot: | |||
# get stopped rates from DB | |||
dbtool = DbService.DbTool() | |||
dbtool.init() | |||
args=["print-run","--purpose","MDC2020_best","--version","v1_1","--run","1200","--table","SimEfficiencies2","--content"] | |||
dbtool.setArgs(args) | |||
dbtool.run() | |||
rr = dbtool.getResult() | |||
* | # get number of target muon stops: | ||
* | target_stopped_mu_per_POT = 1.0 | ||
rate = 1.0 | |||
lines= rr.split("\n") | |||
for line in lines: | |||
words = line.split(",") | |||
if words[0] == "MuminusStopsCat" or words[0] == "MuBeamCat" : | |||
#print(f"Including {words[0]} with rate {words[3]}") | |||
rate = rate * float(words[3]) | |||
target_stopped_mu_per_POT = rate * 1000 | |||
print(f"Final stops rate muon {target_stopped_mu_per_POT}") | |||
== | ==Production Scripts== | ||
To automate parts of the process a number of scripts have been written. These reside in the Produciton repo: Production/ensembles. | |||
There are a number of helper scripts available: | |||
=== ensemble python scripts === | |||
* normalization.py - calculated normalization for each sample based on user assumptions | |||
* maketemplatefcl.py - makes the SamplingInput fcl for the provided data set | |||
* calculateEvents.py - prints number of a specific process events for chosen user inputs | |||
=== ensemble shell scripts === | |||
* Stage1: the S1 script tells you the minimum number of events needed to match a chosen cosmic sample for each input process. The number of jobs for each input process must match the number of chosen cosmic files. You could simulate more than this to allow for failure modes, but only use that number of jobs in the eventual ensembling. | |||
* Stage2: this script combines the input samples, the template fcl and passes these to the grid to run the parrallized ensembling using the standard Mu2e grid tools. | |||
* validation: this script loops over the grid log files and accessess the specific part telling how many of each input were in fact sampled. It sums up those and spits out the total amount of dts events from each process (this includes the dts efficiency, so its only a validation) | |||
== Components == | == Components == | ||
Line 43: | Line 155: | ||
CeEndpoints are a standard part of production. The Leading Log camapign includes the leading log corrections calculated by Szfaron. This results in about 10% of electrons being in a lower momentum tail (as opposed to all being at 104.97 MeV/c in the case of the CeEndpoint). | CeEndpoints are a standard part of production. The Leading Log camapign includes the leading log corrections calculated by Szfaron. This results in about 10% of electrons being in a lower momentum tail (as opposed to all being at 104.97 MeV/c in the case of the CeEndpoint). | ||
[[File:CEMLL.png|512px|center|compares CE and CELL.]] | |||
=== Cosmics === | === Cosmics === | ||
Line 60: | Line 174: | ||
=== RPC === | === RPC === | ||
RPC is simulated using the RPCGun generator. Both internal and external RPC can be simulated using the same generator. | |||
At timing filter on arrival proper time of the stopped pions is used to improve performance of the simulation. This must be factored in when normalizing the samples. | |||
== Input Samples == | |||
Here is a list of the relevant samples used as part of the current Mock Data effort. | |||
The exact samples input into each MDS is mentioned below. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| process | |||
!| campaign | |||
!| generated | |||
!| reconstructed | |||
!| livetime (s) (1BB) | |||
!| POT equiv | |||
!| eff | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CosmicCORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ae</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>9568173</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.1e7</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtailp95MeVc</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_4</tt> | |||
|<tt>401760000</tt> | |||
|<tt>192315262</tt> | |||
|<tt>6032089213</tt> | |||
|<tt>1.81416E+22</tt> | |||
|<tt>0.478</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtailp75MeVc</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_3</tt> | |||
|<tt>160000000 </tt> | |||
|<tt>28887387</tt> | |||
|<tt>2.03E+05</tt> | |||
|<tt>6.11958E+17</tt> | |||
|<tt>0.180</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (95)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ad</tt> | |||
|<tt>3267000</tt> | |||
|<tt>1534077 </tt> | |||
|<tt>127960436.9 </tt> | |||
|<tt>3.84843E+20 </tt> | |||
|<tt>0.469</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (75)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ad_sm0</tt> | |||
|<tt>170150000 </tt> | |||
|<tt>30357435 </tt> | |||
|<tt>2219329 </tt> | |||
|<tt>6.67465E+17</tt> | |||
|<tt>0.178</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CeEndpoint </tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ac</tt> | |||
|<tt>100000</tt> | |||
|<tt>54280</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>0.542</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CeMLeadingLog</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_sm4</tt> | |||
|<tt>22400</tt> | |||
|<tt>11687</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>0.522</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== DIO 75MeV/c short tests == | |||
A set of very short samples with a p>75MeV/c cut on the DIO tail were generated to get a feel for the size and time taken to generate this sample. These are available for anyone testing the trigger, but not useful for physics studies. The larger DIOtail only sample can also be used as in all cases the eventual events were all DIOtails. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| Tag | |||
!| Processes | |||
!| BB | |||
!| equiv. time | |||
!| equiv. POT | |||
!| Rmue | |||
!| conditions | |||
!| Comments | |||
!| sam name | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>testa</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |||
|<tt>17s</tt> | |||
|<tt>5.22e13</tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts,dig,mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-1BB-CEDIO-60s-p75MeVc</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>testb</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |||
|<tt>17s</tt> | |||
|<tt>5.22e13</tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts,dig,mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>testc</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>2BB </tt> | |||
|<tt>13s</tt> | |||
|<tt>7.7e13</tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts,dig,mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-2BB-CEDIO-60s-p75MeVc</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>testd</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |||
|<tt>2BB </tt> | |||
|<tt>13s</tt> | |||
|<tt>7.7e13</tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts,dig,mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-2BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>teste</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts only</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-3600s-p75MeVc</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>testf</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY+PU</tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts only</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensembles-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc-OnSpillMix1BBTriggered</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== | == Mock-Dataset-0 (MDS0) (95 MeV/c) == | ||
The | The MDS0 samples all include DIO tail events with the 95 MeV/c cut. | ||
All components except the RPC are included. Two Rmue values are used, one at 1e-13 which is just below the present upper limit (7e-13) and allows around 55 | All components except the RPC are included. Two Rmue values are used, one at 1e-13 which is just below the present upper limit (7e-13) and allows around 55 generated CE events for the 1 week sample and 222 generated CE for the 1 month livetime (before any selection or reconstruction efficiency is factored in). | ||
The samples available are listed below: | The samples available are listed below: | ||
Line 76: | Line 348: | ||
!| Processes | !| Processes | ||
!| BB | !| BB | ||
!| livetime | !| eqiv POT | ||
!| equiv livetime | |||
!| Rmue | |||
!| conditions | |||
!| sam name | |||
!| Comments | !| Comments | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>MDS0a</tt> | ||
|<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)</tt> | |<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)</tt> | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>1BB </tt> | ||
|<tt>1 | |<tt>1.50e18</tt> | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>4.89E+05 (5.7days)</tt> | ||
|<tt>9.39E-14</tt> | |||
|<tt>best,perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>nts.mu2e.MDS0a.MDC2020ad_perfect_v1_2.root</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>MDS0b</tt> | ||
|<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | ||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |<tt>1BB </tt> | ||
|<tt>1 | |<tt>5.61E+17</tt> | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>1.86E+05 (2.1 days)</tt> | ||
|<tt>1e-13 </tt> | |||
|<tt>best,perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>nts.mu2e.MDS0b.MDC2020ad_perfect_v1_3.root</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>MDS0c</tt> | ||
|<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | ||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |<tt>1BB </tt> | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>2.31E+18</tt> | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>7.70E+05 (8.9 days)</tt> | ||
|<tt>8.88E-14</tt> | |||
|<tt>best,perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-2400000s-p95MeVc-Trigger-</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<tt> | |<tt>MDS0d</tt> | ||
|<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY+PU</tt> | |<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY+PU</tt> | ||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |<tt>1BB </tt> | ||
|<tt>1 | |<tt>5.84E+17</tt> | ||
|<tt> simple | |<tt>1.94E+05 (2.2 days)</tt> | ||
|<tt>1.35E-13</tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-600000s-p95MeVcMix1BBTriggered</tt> | |||
|<tt> normalization somewhat handwavy here, expect similar to pass0b </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS0e</tt> | |||
|<tt>CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY</tt> | |||
|<tt>1BB </tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13 </tt> | |||
|<tt>perfect</tt> | |||
|<tt>dts only: ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-31000000s-p95MeVc</tt> | |||
|<tt> largest simple sample </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
The dts, digi, mcs and TrkAna ntuples are available in the usual locations. In most cases the digi and reco stages were ran with perfect and best condtions. | |||
The component samples which went into these streams are listed here: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| process | |||
!| tag | |||
!| Comments | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CeEndpoint</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ac</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (95MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ad</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (75MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ad_sm0</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CRY Comsic</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020s</tt> | |||
|<tt> 1 year sample, signal stream </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>pile-up/stops</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020p</tt> | |||
|<tt> most recently made mu beam sample </tt> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
== pass 1 == | === Yields === | ||
Before any cuts are applied the true values for each process can be derived using the Process Code: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| tag | |||
!| DIOtail | |||
!| CE | |||
!| Cosmics | |||
!| Other | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS0a</tt> | |||
|<tt>9966</tt> | |||
|<tt>49</tt> | |||
|<tt>N/A</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS0b</tt> | |||
|<tt>3801</tt> | |||
|<tt>20</tt> | |||
|<tt>4684</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS0c</tt> | |||
|<tt>15691</tt> | |||
|<tt>73</tt> | |||
|<tt>19101</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS0d</tt> | |||
|<tt>3956</tt> | |||
|<tt>28</tt> | |||
|<tt>4681</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Once a standard set of cuts is defined we will apply those and update these yields. | |||
=== Effects of Pile-up === | |||
Samples pass0b and pass0d are essentially the same, in terms of physics contributions. However, pass0d contains standard pile up. Here is a list of the processess reconstructed in each file: | |||
* Pass0b: | |||
[(38, 'cosmicCRY', 4684)] | |||
process code counts: | |||
[(12, 'compt', 71), | |||
(13, 'conv', 882), | |||
(14, 'Decay', 181), | |||
(17, 'eIoni', 24), | |||
(31, 'muIoni', 2269), | |||
(34, 'muPairProd', 143), | |||
(56, 'mu2ePrimary', 4684), | |||
(97, 'neutronInelastic', 2), | |||
(99, 'pi_PlusInelastic', 1), | |||
(114, 'DIO', 7), | |||
(116, 'muonNuclear', 4), | |||
(166, 'mu2eMuonDecayAtRest', 3801), | |||
(167, 'mu2eCeMinusEndpoint', 20)] | |||
* Pass0d | |||
(38, 'cosmicCRY', 4681) | |||
process codes: | |||
[(12, 'compt', 176), | |||
(13, 'conv', 892), | |||
(14, 'Decay', 470), | |||
(17, 'eIoni', 39), | |||
(31, 'muIoni', 2285), | |||
(34, 'muPairProd', 139), | |||
(56, 'mu2ePrimary', 4681), | |||
(97, 'neutronInelastic', 1), | |||
(100, 'pi_MinusInelastic', 1), | |||
(114, 'DIO', 456), | |||
(116, 'muonNuclear', 4), | |||
(133, 'RadioactiveDecayBase', 1), | |||
(165, 'mu2eMuonCaptureAtRest', 4), | |||
(166, 'mu2eMuonDecayAtRest', 3956), | |||
(167, 'mu2eCeMinusEndpoint', 28) | |||
So, as you see, the total number of mu2eMuonDecayAtRest is similar, a slight increase in 0d. This could be a result of decays < the chosen cut but also there will be some chance of double counting in current PU model. Part of the goals moving forward is to remove that possibility. There are also a few more CeMinusEndpoints. Whether these would pass selection cuts is not known. We see an increase in compton events, Decay events and DIO (which includes Michel decays and DIFs). We see a small amount of capture backgrounds (4). | |||
== Mock Dataset 1 (MDS1) == | |||
MDS1 will inherit from the MDC2020ae (Cosmics) and MDC2020ai primaries | |||
Several updates are made for MDS 1: | |||
* CeEndpoint now including the leading log too; | |||
* DIO tail momentum cut moved to 75 MeV/c for triggered stream only; | |||
* CORSIKA generator used for cosmics; | |||
* PU streams upgraded (might move to pass2). | |||
* RPC time filtering for in-time bkg | |||
All will assume 1BB: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| Tag | |||
!| Processes | |||
!| equiv livetime | |||
!| Rmue | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1a</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt>~1 week </tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1b</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(75MeV/c)+CORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt> ~1 day </tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1c</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt>~1 month </tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1d</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt>~ 4 months</tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1e</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(75MeV/c)+CORSIKA+PU</tt> | |||
|<tt>~ 1 day</tt> | |||
|<tt>0</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1f</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA+PU</tt> | |||
|<tt>~1 week</tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>MDS1g</tt> | |||
|<tt>CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA+RPC</tt> | |||
|<tt>~1 week</tt> | |||
|<tt>1e-13</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Additional signals will follow | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| process | |||
!| tag | |||
!| events | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CeMLeadingLog</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_sm4</tt> | |||
|<tt> 800K </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (95MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_sm4</tt> | |||
|<tt> very large </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail_95 (95MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ai</tt> | |||
|<tt> 1 year </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail_75 (75MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ai</tt> | |||
|<tt> 1 year </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>DIOtail (75MeV/c)</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2024a_sm3</tt> | |||
|<tt> 1 week </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>CORSIKA</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020ae</tt> | |||
|<tt> </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>pile-up/stops</tt> | |||
|<tt>MDC2020p</tt> | |||
|<tt>- </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1a === | |||
The config is as follows: | |||
njobs= 50 | |||
rmue= 1e-13 | |||
dem_emin= 95 | |||
stops= MDC2020p | |||
cosmics= MDC2020ae | |||
current= MDC2020ai | |||
inputprimary= MDC2020ai | |||
livetime= 623819 | |||
BB= 1BB | |||
Tcycle= 1.33 | |||
POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 | |||
onspilltime= 201493.537 | |||
NPOT= 1.8761473684210527e+18 | |||
CEMLL= 177.97751169106488 | |||
DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 | |||
DIO= 41560.339992620764 | |||
CORSIKA= 201493.537 | |||
Mixed= No | |||
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies): | |||
CeMLL 147 | |||
DIO 19913 (47% efficiency) | |||
Cosmic 184863 | |||
Samples: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1a/MDC2020ai/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>ensemble logs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-etc/cnf/sophie/ensembleMDS1a/MDC2020ai_logs/tar/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ak_perfect_v1_3/art (reprocesses) </tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt> /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ak_perfect_v1_3/root/73/db/ (v6)</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1b === | |||
This is the first large trigger sample. The config is: | |||
njobs= 700 | |||
cosmicjob= MDC2020ag | |||
primaries= MDC2020ai | |||
rmue= 1e-13 | |||
dem_emin= 75 | |||
stops= MDC2020p | |||
livetime= 87263.8 | |||
BB= 1BB | |||
Tcycle= 1.33 | |||
POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 | |||
onspilltime= 28186.207400000003 | |||
NPOT= 2.6244751879699248e+17 | |||
CEMLL= 24.89663505713476 | |||
DIOfrac= 4.188075916508229e-07 | |||
DIO= 66944463.209833 | |||
CORSIKA= 28186.207400000003 | |||
Mixed= No | |||
The resulting true dts sampled number of events are (factoring efficiency), there is some randomness hence these are also quoted here: | |||
CeMLL : 0 | |||
DIO : 1.22e7 (efficiency = 18%) | |||
Cosmic : 28245 (livetime) | |||
Samples: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1b/MDC2020ai/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1bOnSpillTriggered or Triggerable /MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ (56/70 files complete --> factor this into your studies)</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1bOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1c === | |||
configuration: | |||
njobs= 200 | |||
cosmicjob= MDC2020ae | |||
primaries= MDC2020ai | |||
rmue= 0 | |||
dem_emin= 95 | |||
stops= MDC2020p | |||
livetime= 2.49376e+06 | |||
BB= 1BB | |||
Tcycle= 1.33 | |||
POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 | |||
onspilltime= 805484.48 | |||
NPOT= 7.50003007518797e+18 | |||
CEMLL= 0 | |||
DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 | |||
DIO= 166140.36036093475 | |||
CORSIKA= 805484.48 | |||
Mixed = No | |||
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies): | |||
DIO 81079 | |||
CeMLL 0 | |||
cosmic 746665 | |||
Samples: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1c/MDC2020ai/art/ | |||
</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/root/47/ce/nts.mu2e.ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered.MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3.0.root</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1d === | |||
Config: | |||
njobs= 800 | |||
cosmicjob= MDC2020ae | |||
primaries= MDC2020ai | |||
rmue= 1e-13 | |||
dem_emin= 95 | |||
stops= MDC2020p | |||
livetime= 9.96697e+06 | |||
BB= 1BB | |||
Tcycle= 1.33 | |||
POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 | |||
onspilltime= 3219331.31 | |||
NPOT= 2.997584962406015e+19 | |||
CEMLL= 2840.3607712653018 | |||
DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 | |||
DIO= 664023.7984034654 | |||
CORSIKA= 3219331.31 | |||
Mixed= No | |||
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies): | |||
total DIO 323889 | |||
total CeMLL 1592 | |||
total cosmic 2982244 | |||
Samples: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1d/MDC2020ai/art</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered or Triggerable /MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt> /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/root/d3/6f/ (v6)</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1e === | |||
This sample is MDS1b with standard pile up mixed in. | |||
Notes: | |||
- Only 640/700 files made it through the mixing due to memory limits. | |||
- 6/7 nts files are on tape due to memory limit. | |||
Factor these into any calculations done with these files! | |||
files: | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>see MDS1b</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/ and Triggerable</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/ | |||
</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1f === | |||
This is MDS1a + Mixing. There was a loss of files at the mixing stage so the results are expected to represent 90% of MDS1a. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>see MDS1a</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ andTriggerable</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt>pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
=== MDS1g === | |||
Includes in-time RPC only | |||
njobs= 50 | |||
cosmicjob= MDC2020ae | |||
primaries= MDC2020ai | |||
rmue= 1e-13 | |||
dem_emin= 95 | |||
stops= MDC2020p | |||
livetime= 623819 | |||
BB= 1BB | |||
Tcycle= 1.33 | |||
POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 | |||
onspilltime= 201493.537 | |||
NPOT= 1.8761473684210527e+18 | |||
CEMLL= 177.97751169106488 | |||
DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 | |||
DIO= 41560.339992620764 | |||
CORSIKA= 201493.537 | |||
pistops/POT 0.00223279 | |||
pi time eff 0.06459918608102208 | |||
pi surv prob 0.0008919234313257805 | |||
BRRPC= 0.0215 | |||
InternalRPCNoDecay= 35806098.080112204 | |||
InternalRPCTimeWeightStops= 1148 | |||
InternalRPCTimeWeightResampled= 3746.078412 | |||
The dts contains: | |||
total DIO 20307 | |||
total CeMLL 100 | |||
total cosmic 190360 | |||
total internal RPC 203 | |||
total external RPC 299 | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| family | |||
!| location | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dts</tt> | |||
|<tt>/pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1g/MDC2020am/art/ | |||
</tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>dig</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>mcs</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|<tt>nts</tt> | |||
|<tt></tt> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== Mock Dataset 2 (MDS2) == | |||
The move to MDS2 is defined by how we run our pile-up streams. | |||
In MDS1 we allowed for double counting in the DIOtail and low statistic (over sampling) in the IPA Michel electron contribution. We did not include the radiatve muon capture backgrounds either. | |||
MDS2 will use a new schema for the pile-up which will allow high statistics sampling of the IPA Michel contribution and inclusion of the RMC component. We will also move to a new system of making the new physics/signal streams separate from the ``known physics" background. | |||
To summarize, in MDS2: | |||
* RMC with nominal kmax (91 MeV/c) | |||
* RPC improvements in efficiency by introducing a minimum energy cut | |||
* IPA Michel electrons added as primaries | |||
* Pile-up stream edits such that we remove the double counting from MDS1 | |||
* Possible e+ and e- signals are introduced by users | |||
To elaborate on that last point: | |||
In MDS2 the ``ensemble" will be background only. We will make a large sample (using all cosmics). The signal will be optional and mixed in by analysis users. | |||
A script will be provided to make the user side easier. This will require thorough testing before being rolled out. |
Latest revision as of 19:21, 27 November 2024
MDC2020 ensembles
MDC2024 is the original name which is now part of MDC2020, and refers specifically to the ensembles/mock data made using MDC2020 stops and primaries.
Introduction
Mock data samples can be helpful in two ways:
- to help prepare physics analysis efforts;
- to help us understand the size of our data .art files and ntuples.
Notes and Developer Details
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bJS8e5AjnK8CR9j4Bcket7a7vv9A4sAgC2AbTUPl7t4/edit?usp=sharing
Streams
The two purposes above (physics studies, trigger studies) will result in different samples, with differing complexity.
Physics stream
Includes all major components and pile-up. The DIOtail momentum cut can be higher (nominally p>95 MeV/c will be used as a starting point). Three samples will be made: signal at just below current limit (1e-13), closed sample (random signal choice), no signal.
Trigger stream
Here all backgrounds and pile-up will be included but no signal. The DIOtail cut is reduced below the trigger threshold to p > 75 MeV/c.
Inputs
There are several assumptions made when we choose a livetime:
Booster Batch Mode
The Booster Batch (BB) mode describes the incoming operational mode of the booster which feeds the beam through our delivery ring which in turn passes protons to Mu2e.
There are two "run modes" in Mu2e: 1BB and 2BB, in the low-intensity running mode the mean intensity is 1.6E7 protons/pulse and in the higher-intensity mode this becomes 3.9E7 protons/pulse.
Batch | Time (s) | T Cycle (s) | T Spill (s) | Spills | frac | On Spill Time | N-cycles | POT per cycle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 9.52E+06 | 1.33 | 1.07E-01 | 4 | 0.323 | 3.07E+06 | 7.16E+06 | 4.00E+12 |
2 | 1.58E+06 | 1.4 | 4.31E-02 | 8 | 0.246 | 3.89E+05 | 1.13E+06 | 8.00E+12 |
Expected DIOs
The expected number of muon stops per POT is 1.56E-3 muons/POT (from MDC2020p). The decay : capture ratio for Al is 0.39:0.61.
In our simulation, we tend to focus on simulating the higher momentum tail with cuts of p > 75MeV/c sampling a fraction of 4.19E-07 of the entire DIO spectrum. and p > 95 MeV/c sampling a fraction of 3.64E-11 of the entire DIO spectrum.
livetime | BB | POT | Stopped Muons | DIOs (p>75MeV/c) | DIOs (p>95MeV/c) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 hour | 1BB | 1.08E16 | 1.67e+13 | 7.10e6 | 609 |
Sim Efficiencies and Databases
One major improvement from the previous MDC2018 is that we now have database implementation in Mu2e. This includes a "SimEfficiency" data-base which can be used to extract the expected rates from the simulation, without need for hardcoding. Here is an example of how to extract the number of stopped muons per pot:
# get stopped rates from DB dbtool = DbService.DbTool() dbtool.init() args=["print-run","--purpose","MDC2020_best","--version","v1_1","--run","1200","--table","SimEfficiencies2","--content"] dbtool.setArgs(args) dbtool.run() rr = dbtool.getResult() # get number of target muon stops: target_stopped_mu_per_POT = 1.0 rate = 1.0 lines= rr.split("\n") for line in lines: words = line.split(",") if words[0] == "MuminusStopsCat" or words[0] == "MuBeamCat" : #print(f"Including {words[0]} with rate {words[3]}") rate = rate * float(words[3]) target_stopped_mu_per_POT = rate * 1000 print(f"Final stops rate muon {target_stopped_mu_per_POT}")
Production Scripts
To automate parts of the process a number of scripts have been written. These reside in the Produciton repo: Production/ensembles.
There are a number of helper scripts available:
ensemble python scripts
- normalization.py - calculated normalization for each sample based on user assumptions
- maketemplatefcl.py - makes the SamplingInput fcl for the provided data set
- calculateEvents.py - prints number of a specific process events for chosen user inputs
ensemble shell scripts
- Stage1: the S1 script tells you the minimum number of events needed to match a chosen cosmic sample for each input process. The number of jobs for each input process must match the number of chosen cosmic files. You could simulate more than this to allow for failure modes, but only use that number of jobs in the eventual ensembling.
- Stage2: this script combines the input samples, the template fcl and passes these to the grid to run the parrallized ensembling using the standard Mu2e grid tools.
- validation: this script loops over the grid log files and accessess the specific part telling how many of each input were in fact sampled. It sums up those and spits out the total amount of dts events from each process (this includes the dts efficiency, so its only a validation)
Components
DIO tail
The DIO tails is simulated from stopped muons using the SingleProcessGenerator defined in the Offline EventGenerator directory. The DIOGenerator tool is used to provide the correct momentum distribution based on the 5-8 polynomial derived by Czarnecki et al.
A filter called GenFilter is used to remove events unlikely to produce viable events in the reconstruction. The effect of the filter is to improve the time performance by 40%, there is no loss of efficiency.
Two DIO tail samples are included as primaries in two sets of samples for MDC2024: one has a cut at p > 95 MeV/c (a fraction of 3.64e-11 of the entire DIO momentum spectrum) and another has a lower cut, below the trigger threshold, of p > 75 MeV/c (a fraction of 4.19e-7 of the entire DIO spectrum).
In previous simulation studies, DIOs of all momenta are included in the pile-up stream and not as primaries, including them as primaries has the advantage of giving us a large sample of events and therefore increased realism.
Conversion and Conversion Leading Log
CeEndpoints are a standard part of production. The Leading Log camapign includes the leading log corrections calculated by Szfaron. This results in about 10% of electrons being in a lower momentum tail (as opposed to all being at 104.97 MeV/c in the case of the CeEndpoint).
Cosmics
As part of SU2020 a campaign that used the CORSIKA generator was built and exercised, providing 1.1e7s of cosmic events to be sampled from. Similarily a campaign of a similar size using the CRY generator is also available.
The CRY sample is used for pass 0, but the CORSIKA one is used for the later camapigns.
Pile-up
For pass 0 the existing pile-up streams were used. These were mixed with the combined primary sample as if it were any other primary sample.
This will provide some inaccuracies, as we are mixing in two DIO samples (one as a primary for p > 95 MeV/c and one which is part of the MuStopPileup sample and covers all momentum ranges up to the endpoint). This could introduce some double counting but it is unlikely to overly effect the outcomes of any physics analysis applied to these samples.
For future passes, custom pile-up samples will be combined as primaries in the same way we have done the DIO tails.
RPC
RPC is simulated using the RPCGun generator. Both internal and external RPC can be simulated using the same generator.
At timing filter on arrival proper time of the stopped pions is used to improve performance of the simulation. This must be factored in when normalizing the samples.
Input Samples
Here is a list of the relevant samples used as part of the current Mock Data effort.
The exact samples input into each MDS is mentioned below.
process | campaign | generated | reconstructed | livetime (s) (1BB) | POT equiv | eff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CosmicCORSIKA | MDC2020ae | 9568173 | 1.1e7 | |||
DIOtailp95MeVc | MDC2024a_4 | 401760000 | 192315262 | 6032089213 | 1.81416E+22 | 0.478 |
DIOtailp75MeVc | MDC2024a_3 | 160000000 | 28887387 | 2.03E+05 | 6.11958E+17 | 0.180 |
DIOtail (95) | MDC2020ad | 3267000 | 1534077 | 127960436.9 | 3.84843E+20 | 0.469 |
DIOtail (75) | MDC2020ad_sm0 | 170150000 | 30357435 | 2219329 | 6.67465E+17 | 0.178 |
CeEndpoint | MDC2020ac | 100000 | 54280 | 0.542 | ||
CeMLeadingLog | MDC2024a_sm4 | 22400 | 11687 | 0.522 |
DIO 75MeV/c short tests
A set of very short samples with a p>75MeV/c cut on the DIO tail were generated to get a feel for the size and time taken to generate this sample. These are available for anyone testing the trigger, but not useful for physics studies. The larger DIOtail only sample can also be used as in all cases the eventual events were all DIOtails.
Tag | Processes | BB | equiv. time | equiv. POT | Rmue | conditions | Comments | sam name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
testa | CE+DIO(75MeV/c) | 1BB | 17s | 5.22e13 | 0 | perfect | dts,dig,mcs | ensemble-1BB-CEDIO-60s-p75MeVc |
testb | CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY | 1BB | 17s | 5.22e13 | 0 | perfect | dts,dig,mcs | ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc |
testc | CE+DIO(75MeV/c) | 2BB | 13s | 7.7e13 | 0 | perfect | dts,dig,mcs | ensemble-2BB-CEDIO-60s-p75MeVc |
testd | CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY | 2BB | 13s | 7.7e13 | 0 | perfect | dts,dig,mcs | ensemble-2BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc |
teste | CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY | 1BB | 0 | perfect | dts only | ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-3600s-p75MeVc | ||
testf | CE+DIO(75MeV/c)+CRY+PU | 1BB | 0 | perfect | dts only | ensembles-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-60s-p75MeVc-OnSpillMix1BBTriggered |
Mock-Dataset-0 (MDS0) (95 MeV/c)
The MDS0 samples all include DIO tail events with the 95 MeV/c cut.
All components except the RPC are included. Two Rmue values are used, one at 1e-13 which is just below the present upper limit (7e-13) and allows around 55 generated CE events for the 1 week sample and 222 generated CE for the 1 month livetime (before any selection or reconstruction efficiency is factored in).
The samples available are listed below:
Tag | Processes | BB | eqiv POT | equiv livetime | Rmue | conditions | sam name | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDS0a | CE+DIO(95MeV/c) | 1BB | 1.50e18 | 4.89E+05 (5.7days) | 9.39E-14 | best,perfect | nts.mu2e.MDS0a.MDC2020ad_perfect_v1_2.root | |
MDS0b | CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY | 1BB | 5.61E+17 | 1.86E+05 (2.1 days) | 1e-13 | best,perfect | nts.mu2e.MDS0b.MDC2020ad_perfect_v1_3.root | |
MDS0c | CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY | 1BB | 2.31E+18 | 7.70E+05 (8.9 days) | 8.88E-14 | best,perfect | ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-2400000s-p95MeVc-Trigger- | |
MDS0d | CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY+PU | 1BB | 5.84E+17 | 1.94E+05 (2.2 days) | 1.35E-13 | perfect | ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-600000s-p95MeVcMix1BBTriggered | normalization somewhat handwavy here, expect similar to pass0b |
MDS0e | CE+DIO(95MeV/c)+CRY | 1BB | 1e-13 | perfect | dts only: ensemble-1BB-CEDIOCRYCosmic-31000000s-p95MeVc | largest simple sample |
The dts, digi, mcs and TrkAna ntuples are available in the usual locations. In most cases the digi and reco stages were ran with perfect and best condtions.
The component samples which went into these streams are listed here:
process | tag | Comments |
---|---|---|
CeEndpoint | MDC2020ac | |
DIOtail (95MeV/c) | MDC2020ad | |
DIOtail (75MeV/c) | MDC2020ad_sm0 | |
CRY Comsic | MDC2020s | 1 year sample, signal stream |
pile-up/stops | MDC2020p | most recently made mu beam sample |
Yields
Before any cuts are applied the true values for each process can be derived using the Process Code:
tag | DIOtail | CE | Cosmics | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDS0a | 9966 | 49 | N/A | |
MDS0b | 3801 | 20 | 4684 | |
MDS0c | 15691 | 73 | 19101 | |
MDS0d | 3956 | 28 | 4681 |
Once a standard set of cuts is defined we will apply those and update these yields.
Effects of Pile-up
Samples pass0b and pass0d are essentially the same, in terms of physics contributions. However, pass0d contains standard pile up. Here is a list of the processess reconstructed in each file:
- Pass0b:
[(38, 'cosmicCRY', 4684)] process code counts: [(12, 'compt', 71), (13, 'conv', 882), (14, 'Decay', 181), (17, 'eIoni', 24), (31, 'muIoni', 2269), (34, 'muPairProd', 143), (56, 'mu2ePrimary', 4684), (97, 'neutronInelastic', 2), (99, 'pi_PlusInelastic', 1), (114, 'DIO', 7), (116, 'muonNuclear', 4), (166, 'mu2eMuonDecayAtRest', 3801), (167, 'mu2eCeMinusEndpoint', 20)]
- Pass0d
(38, 'cosmicCRY', 4681) process codes: [(12, 'compt', 176), (13, 'conv', 892), (14, 'Decay', 470), (17, 'eIoni', 39), (31, 'muIoni', 2285), (34, 'muPairProd', 139), (56, 'mu2ePrimary', 4681), (97, 'neutronInelastic', 1), (100, 'pi_MinusInelastic', 1), (114, 'DIO', 456), (116, 'muonNuclear', 4), (133, 'RadioactiveDecayBase', 1), (165, 'mu2eMuonCaptureAtRest', 4), (166, 'mu2eMuonDecayAtRest', 3956), (167, 'mu2eCeMinusEndpoint', 28)
So, as you see, the total number of mu2eMuonDecayAtRest is similar, a slight increase in 0d. This could be a result of decays < the chosen cut but also there will be some chance of double counting in current PU model. Part of the goals moving forward is to remove that possibility. There are also a few more CeMinusEndpoints. Whether these would pass selection cuts is not known. We see an increase in compton events, Decay events and DIO (which includes Michel decays and DIFs). We see a small amount of capture backgrounds (4).
Mock Dataset 1 (MDS1)
MDS1 will inherit from the MDC2020ae (Cosmics) and MDC2020ai primaries
Several updates are made for MDS 1:
- CeEndpoint now including the leading log too;
- DIO tail momentum cut moved to 75 MeV/c for triggered stream only;
- CORSIKA generator used for cosmics;
- PU streams upgraded (might move to pass2).
- RPC time filtering for in-time bkg
All will assume 1BB:
Tag | Processes | equiv livetime | Rmue | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MDS1a | CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA | ~1 week | 1e-13 | |
MDS1b | CELL+DIO(75MeV/c)+CORSIKA | ~1 day | 1e-13 | |
MDS1c | CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA | ~1 month | 0 | |
MDS1d | CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA | ~ 4 months | 1e-13 | |
MDS1e | CELL+DIO(75MeV/c)+CORSIKA+PU | ~ 1 day | 0 | |
MDS1f | CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA+PU | ~1 week | 1e-13 | |
MDS1g | CELL+DIO(95MeV/c)+CORSIKA+RPC | ~1 week | 1e-13 |
Additional signals will follow
process | tag | events |
---|---|---|
CeMLeadingLog | MDC2024a_sm4 | 800K |
DIOtail (95MeV/c) | MDC2024a_sm4 | very large |
DIOtail_95 (95MeV/c) | MDC2020ai | 1 year |
DIOtail_75 (75MeV/c) | MDC2020ai | 1 year |
DIOtail (75MeV/c) | MDC2024a_sm3 | 1 week |
CORSIKA | MDC2020ae | |
pile-up/stops | MDC2020p | - |
MDS1a
The config is as follows:
njobs= 50 rmue= 1e-13 dem_emin= 95 stops= MDC2020p cosmics= MDC2020ae current= MDC2020ai inputprimary= MDC2020ai livetime= 623819 BB= 1BB Tcycle= 1.33 POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 onspilltime= 201493.537 NPOT= 1.8761473684210527e+18 CEMLL= 177.97751169106488 DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 DIO= 41560.339992620764 CORSIKA= 201493.537 Mixed= No
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies):
CeMLL 147 DIO 19913 (47% efficiency) Cosmic 184863
Samples:
family | location |
---|---|
dts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1a/MDC2020ai/art/ |
ensemble logs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-etc/cnf/sophie/ensembleMDS1a/MDC2020ai_logs/tar/ |
dig | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ak_perfect_v1_3/art (reprocesses) |
nts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1aOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ak_perfect_v1_3/root/73/db/ (v6) |
MDS1b
This is the first large trigger sample. The config is:
njobs= 700 cosmicjob= MDC2020ag primaries= MDC2020ai rmue= 1e-13 dem_emin= 75 stops= MDC2020p livetime= 87263.8 BB= 1BB Tcycle= 1.33 POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 onspilltime= 28186.207400000003 NPOT= 2.6244751879699248e+17 CEMLL= 24.89663505713476 DIOfrac= 4.188075916508229e-07 DIO= 66944463.209833 CORSIKA= 28186.207400000003 Mixed= No
The resulting true dts sampled number of events are (factoring efficiency), there is some randomness hence these are also quoted here:
CeMLL : 0 DIO : 1.22e7 (efficiency = 18%) Cosmic : 28245 (livetime)
Samples:
family | location |
---|---|
dts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1b/MDC2020ai/ |
dig | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1bOnSpillTriggered or Triggerable /MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ (56/70 files complete --> factor this into your studies) |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1bOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ |
MDS1c
configuration:
njobs= 200 cosmicjob= MDC2020ae primaries= MDC2020ai rmue= 0 dem_emin= 95 stops= MDC2020p livetime= 2.49376e+06 BB= 1BB Tcycle= 1.33 POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 onspilltime= 805484.48 NPOT= 7.50003007518797e+18 CEMLL= 0 DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 DIO= 166140.36036093475 CORSIKA= 805484.48 Mixed = No
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies):
DIO 81079 CeMLL 0 cosmic 746665
Samples:
family | location |
---|---|
dts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1c/MDC2020ai/art/
|
dig | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/art/ |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ |
nts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/root/47/ce/nts.mu2e.ensembleMDS1cOnSpillTriggered.MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3.0.root |
MDS1d
Config:
njobs= 800 cosmicjob= MDC2020ae primaries= MDC2020ai rmue= 1e-13 dem_emin= 95 stops= MDC2020p livetime= 9.96697e+06 BB= 1BB Tcycle= 1.33 POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 onspilltime= 3219331.31 NPOT= 2.997584962406015e+19 CEMLL= 2840.3607712653018 DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 DIO= 664023.7984034654 CORSIKA= 3219331.31 Mixed= No
The values extracred from the ensemble log files are as follows (factoring random sampling and efficiencies):
total DIO 323889 total CeMLL 1592 total cosmic 2982244
Samples:
family | location |
---|---|
dts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1d/MDC2020ai/art |
dig | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered or Triggerable /MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ |
nts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1dOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/root/d3/6f/ (v6) |
MDS1e
This sample is MDS1b with standard pile up mixed in.
Notes: - Only 640/700 files made it through the mixing due to memory limits. - 6/7 nts files are on tape due to memory limit.
Factor these into any calculations done with these files!
files:
family | location |
---|---|
dts | see MDS1b |
dig | /mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/ and Triggerable |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/
|
nts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1eOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/ |
MDS1f
This is MDS1a + Mixing. There was a loss of files at the mixing stage so the results are expected to represent 90% of MDS1a.
family | location |
---|---|
dts | see MDS1a |
dig | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/dig/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ andTriggerable |
mcs | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-sim/mcs/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fMix1BBTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/art/ |
nts | pnfs/mu2e/tape/phy-nts/nts/mu2e/ensembleMDS1fOnSpillTriggered/MDC2020ai_perfect_v1_3/ |
MDS1g
Includes in-time RPC only
njobs= 50 cosmicjob= MDC2020ae primaries= MDC2020ai rmue= 1e-13 dem_emin= 95 stops= MDC2020p livetime= 623819 BB= 1BB Tcycle= 1.33 POT_per_cycle= 4000000000000.0 onspilltime= 201493.537 NPOT= 1.8761473684210527e+18 CEMLL= 177.97751169106488 DIOfrac= 3.6370937564509995e-11 DIO= 41560.339992620764 CORSIKA= 201493.537 pistops/POT 0.00223279 pi time eff 0.06459918608102208 pi surv prob 0.0008919234313257805 BRRPC= 0.0215 InternalRPCNoDecay= 35806098.080112204 InternalRPCTimeWeightStops= 1148 InternalRPCTimeWeightResampled= 3746.078412
The dts contains:
total DIO 20307 total CeMLL 100 total cosmic 190360 total internal RPC 203 total external RPC 299
family | location |
---|---|
dts | /pnfs/mu2e/tape/usr-sim/dts/sophie/ensembleMDS1g/MDC2020am/art/
|
dig | |
mcs | |
nts |
Mock Dataset 2 (MDS2)
The move to MDS2 is defined by how we run our pile-up streams.
In MDS1 we allowed for double counting in the DIOtail and low statistic (over sampling) in the IPA Michel electron contribution. We did not include the radiatve muon capture backgrounds either.
MDS2 will use a new schema for the pile-up which will allow high statistics sampling of the IPA Michel contribution and inclusion of the RMC component. We will also move to a new system of making the new physics/signal streams separate from the ``known physics" background.
To summarize, in MDS2:
- RMC with nominal kmax (91 MeV/c)
- RPC improvements in efficiency by introducing a minimum energy cut
- IPA Michel electrons added as primaries
- Pile-up stream edits such that we remove the double counting from MDS1
- Possible e+ and e- signals are introduced by users
To elaborate on that last point:
In MDS2 the ``ensemble" will be background only. We will make a large sample (using all cosmics). The signal will be optional and mixed in by analysis users.
A script will be provided to make the user side easier. This will require thorough testing before being rolled out.